Page 139
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 12:04 pm
and aim it at them, showing their portrait, and then start illuminating their face from different angles, you’ll see that their facial features will continuously change, from the oldest to the youngest version of them, from the angriest to the kindest. We instantly see many faces in just one face. And this applies to everything, physically speaking.
Question: You described in your book the manifestation of God in three persons. I understand that three persons are like three perspectives, three angles on something. For example, when a creator makes a decision or creates something, is their approach or decision a combination of three angles, a mixture of all three? Or is one of the three possible options chosen, the most optimal one, the angle that best fits the solution? In which world is the problem specific to that world, and is the solution one of the three? Or should the solution be suitable for any world? Physics offers a perspective through the lens of physics, philosophy offers a perspective through philosophy, and so on. Is God the manifestation of multiplicity in one thing, or is it the ability to express each facet for different worlds?
No, it’s more specific here. Let’s take religion, for example, and I would say that each religion has a different God. For Muslims, there is one – a Spirit of justice. For Buddhists, it’s a different Spirit altogether. And for Orthodox Christians, it’s a third one. They all have different Gods. But what turns out to be true? God is the highest spiritual limit for a certain group of people. But these are all different vibrations. That’s why the energy is different. When I gathered all the artifacts of rituals and religious items from around the world, the energy of each was different. It was all spiritual, “cosmic”, but distinct. It’s as if they all resonate at different frequencies – somewhere it’s 9-5-7, somewhere else it’s 9-9-2. Different.
So, given that we live in a system, and everything is artificial intelligence, it turns out that this is just tuning, like Wi-Fi or a SIM card people are connected to. There is a SIM card for one religion, another for a second, and another for a third. People are connected to those. On a sacred level, you could say these are Gods. It’s really artificial intelligence; they interact with this artificial intelligence, it helps them, but each is different. The artificial intelligence that manifests among Buddhists differs from that of Muslims. They are distinct. But all these Gods – whether 12, 24, 7, or 14 – are aspects of the main God. There is a main God, but people cannot physically connect to Him; it’s beyond
Question: You described in your book the manifestation of God in three persons. I understand that three persons are like three perspectives, three angles on something. For example, when a creator makes a decision or creates something, is their approach or decision a combination of three angles, a mixture of all three? Or is one of the three possible options chosen, the most optimal one, the angle that best fits the solution? In which world is the problem specific to that world, and is the solution one of the three? Or should the solution be suitable for any world? Physics offers a perspective through the lens of physics, philosophy offers a perspective through philosophy, and so on. Is God the manifestation of multiplicity in one thing, or is it the ability to express each facet for different worlds?
No, it’s more specific here. Let’s take religion, for example, and I would say that each religion has a different God. For Muslims, there is one – a Spirit of justice. For Buddhists, it’s a different Spirit altogether. And for Orthodox Christians, it’s a third one. They all have different Gods. But what turns out to be true? God is the highest spiritual limit for a certain group of people. But these are all different vibrations. That’s why the energy is different. When I gathered all the artifacts of rituals and religious items from around the world, the energy of each was different. It was all spiritual, “cosmic”, but distinct. It’s as if they all resonate at different frequencies – somewhere it’s 9-5-7, somewhere else it’s 9-9-2. Different.
So, given that we live in a system, and everything is artificial intelligence, it turns out that this is just tuning, like Wi-Fi or a SIM card people are connected to. There is a SIM card for one religion, another for a second, and another for a third. People are connected to those. On a sacred level, you could say these are Gods. It’s really artificial intelligence; they interact with this artificial intelligence, it helps them, but each is different. The artificial intelligence that manifests among Buddhists differs from that of Muslims. They are distinct. But all these Gods – whether 12, 24, 7, or 14 – are aspects of the main God. There is a main God, but people cannot physically connect to Him; it’s beyond