Page 226
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 1:14 pm
Question: In Hinduism, particularly in one of the Sikh traditions, there is a concept of God as the Absolute. This concept is also found in other religions and is represented as singular, universal, without beginning, denoting an entity that is self-sufficient, eternal, actual, and an infinite spiritual reality in which the event of all that exists is rooted. In Christianity, is there a similar comparison – is it God the Father or the Trinity? Or is such a comparison not possible at all? I just want to know if there is a teaching that is closest to the truth.
There is no single closest to the truth. To approach the truth you are seeking, you should first note that there is not one answer and not one path. These are paths from different sides of the world, and they are parallel and distinct. As I have previously tried to convey, when gathering all the puzzle pieces of information, you should not put them all into one basket and mix them up. We are assembling mosaics from three different companies. And they are indeed three different images. We find the pieces and see that they are from our collection, but we must understand whether they are from the second box or the third. We should not mix all these boxes into one. This needs to be understood. So, what is closest to the truth? It is closer to the truth when you study all religions, for example, and do not mix them together but arrange them according to directions and corners. Then you will understand how and what. This is all a path to the truth. But it is not some one-sided or limited path. It needs to be looked at from all sides, not just one. Not choosing one side, but all. This is very important. And you can generally observe how this happens with me. In the first volume of “Alternative History”, I talked about one thing, in the second about another, in the third about another. And everything that needs to be encountered in the correct sequence is what I encounter. And what do we now get with the Revelation of John the Theologian, “Apocalypse”? Now we have the decoding, you see, of Hinduism. This means it continues. But this does not mean that the other is invalid. It is also valid. Both are true. It just shows how it can be seen differently. For instance, in the Revelation of John the Theologian, there will also be a new city, and there seems to be a battle with dark forces. This also happens in Hinduism. But it is described, you see, in a different language. Some things are described more modestly, some more detailed. Some aspects are more emphasized, some less. And then, you see, there are some Arab scriptures where there was some Alexander. And then someone else somewhere, and all will be compared, gathered, and assembled into one. So, a little bit everywhere,
There is no single closest to the truth. To approach the truth you are seeking, you should first note that there is not one answer and not one path. These are paths from different sides of the world, and they are parallel and distinct. As I have previously tried to convey, when gathering all the puzzle pieces of information, you should not put them all into one basket and mix them up. We are assembling mosaics from three different companies. And they are indeed three different images. We find the pieces and see that they are from our collection, but we must understand whether they are from the second box or the third. We should not mix all these boxes into one. This needs to be understood. So, what is closest to the truth? It is closer to the truth when you study all religions, for example, and do not mix them together but arrange them according to directions and corners. Then you will understand how and what. This is all a path to the truth. But it is not some one-sided or limited path. It needs to be looked at from all sides, not just one. Not choosing one side, but all. This is very important. And you can generally observe how this happens with me. In the first volume of “Alternative History”, I talked about one thing, in the second about another, in the third about another. And everything that needs to be encountered in the correct sequence is what I encounter. And what do we now get with the Revelation of John the Theologian, “Apocalypse”? Now we have the decoding, you see, of Hinduism. This means it continues. But this does not mean that the other is invalid. It is also valid. Both are true. It just shows how it can be seen differently. For instance, in the Revelation of John the Theologian, there will also be a new city, and there seems to be a battle with dark forces. This also happens in Hinduism. But it is described, you see, in a different language. Some things are described more modestly, some more detailed. Some aspects are more emphasized, some less. And then, you see, there are some Arab scriptures where there was some Alexander. And then someone else somewhere, and all will be compared, gathered, and assembled into one. So, a little bit everywhere,