Page 256
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2025 6:37 pm
Of course, there are historical explanations and facts as to why: Peter the First, the reformer, traveled through Europe, saw all sorts of interesting things, and decided to build such a city. That’s clear. But why is my novel “Alternative History” called “Alternative History”? Because it offers an alternative view on our entire life, on people, on events, situations, on the future, past, and present. And now I’ll say this: this city is from another time. When it was being built, it was built by the spirit of the future. So, the entire Rus, which was all across Russia, this Rus was full of warriors, little churches, all of that remained. But St. Petersburg – it’s a different Spirit, built by the Spirit of another time, from the future. It was built for a future that hasn’t arrived yet. That’s why it’s different. And this whole city – it’s all one big temple. And how I understand it is that all this information will be revealed in the future, in the next volumes of “Alternative History,” but that’s not coming soon. Perhaps it will be after the seventh volume of “Alternative History.”
Question: You wrote that something was always built on power places. Could it be the opposite, that a power spot appears because something was built there?
I can say, if you ask this question, like the classic “which came first, the chicken or the egg,” the question that all scientists wonder about. But, you see, one can say that everything we see built now, especially unique and sacred places, which we have all over the earth, were built in places where sacred places existed before. Even if they were destroyed, washed away, demolished, or buried, these places are still built again in the future. Can we assume that because something was built there before, it is considered a power spot, and that’s why they build there again? It can be considered like that. But to answer the way you phrased the question — whether a power spot appears because something was built there — no. It seems to me that even before any constructions, the original power spot is a power spot not because of the buildings, but simply because it is a specific point. Just a specific point. You know, I can answer this question once again, even though I’ve answered it many times in my books, and also answer two of the most interesting questions that scientists puzzle over and don’t understand the right answer to. About the chicken or the egg, everyone doesn’t understand which came first, but in fact,
Question: You wrote that something was always built on power places. Could it be the opposite, that a power spot appears because something was built there?
I can say, if you ask this question, like the classic “which came first, the chicken or the egg,” the question that all scientists wonder about. But, you see, one can say that everything we see built now, especially unique and sacred places, which we have all over the earth, were built in places where sacred places existed before. Even if they were destroyed, washed away, demolished, or buried, these places are still built again in the future. Can we assume that because something was built there before, it is considered a power spot, and that’s why they build there again? It can be considered like that. But to answer the way you phrased the question — whether a power spot appears because something was built there — no. It seems to me that even before any constructions, the original power spot is a power spot not because of the buildings, but simply because it is a specific point. Just a specific point. You know, I can answer this question once again, even though I’ve answered it many times in my books, and also answer two of the most interesting questions that scientists puzzle over and don’t understand the right answer to. About the chicken or the egg, everyone doesn’t understand which came first, but in fact,