Page 862
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2025 10:10 am
And to truly realize it, you have to first learn everything about the world. It’s as if you need to read a million of the smartest and oldest books, study all of history, all mythology, all religions. Only then can you actually understand where we are, why we live, and what comes next. And only then are you ready for a new matrix — as if it’s a firmware update in your mind, new information. Because information itself is the reality we live in. Old information is the old matrix. But if you destroy that old information, devalue it, and give people new information, they’ll fall into a new matrix. That means they’ll have a new value system, a new coordinate system, a new framework for perception — of themselves, others, and the world. And that is the new matrix. In my “Alternative History,” I reveal how the entire old world works in order to make the transition to the new one. The old has expired, and the new is already being launched in parallel. It’s like a wheel within a wheel, like a sphere within a sphere. The old is already done, and the new is the transition itself. People are moving into this new world.
Question: I’m writing how I understood what the matrix is. To me, it seems like it’s all the Platonic solids, through which light and energy move. They interact with one another, moving like molecules. And if a lot of them are assembled in the correct sequence, you could get a tree, for example — or even a planet, something on that scale. I watched a film called “Samadhi,” a very long one, and it also said that the whole world is made of Platonic solids. So here’s my question: am I thinking in the right direction?
It feels as if you’re not truly my reader. You see, the person who has read “Alternative History”, all of my volumes — even if you haven’t read every single one — already clearly understands the boundaries between what’s fake and what’s real. But your thinking seems to be on the other side, with those who follow that false spirituality, the one the devil lures them into. They’re the ones who stand on nails, who watch that movie you mentioned. And I don’t even understand the question. It’s as if you’re asking me about a film, not about my book. You’re not asking about what I wrote in the second volume, about the matrix and how I referred to sacred scriptures — you’re referring to a completely different movie, which is, in fact, watered-down, mainstream content meant for people who take hallucinogens in jungles, during island trips, and then
Question: I’m writing how I understood what the matrix is. To me, it seems like it’s all the Platonic solids, through which light and energy move. They interact with one another, moving like molecules. And if a lot of them are assembled in the correct sequence, you could get a tree, for example — or even a planet, something on that scale. I watched a film called “Samadhi,” a very long one, and it also said that the whole world is made of Platonic solids. So here’s my question: am I thinking in the right direction?
It feels as if you’re not truly my reader. You see, the person who has read “Alternative History”, all of my volumes — even if you haven’t read every single one — already clearly understands the boundaries between what’s fake and what’s real. But your thinking seems to be on the other side, with those who follow that false spirituality, the one the devil lures them into. They’re the ones who stand on nails, who watch that movie you mentioned. And I don’t even understand the question. It’s as if you’re asking me about a film, not about my book. You’re not asking about what I wrote in the second volume, about the matrix and how I referred to sacred scriptures — you’re referring to a completely different movie, which is, in fact, watered-down, mainstream content meant for people who take hallucinogens in jungles, during island trips, and then