Page 867

[Alexandr Korol]

And it’s the same here — if I look at my cube, my matrix, I can tilt it slightly upward or slightly downward, but the triangle remains a triangle — an equilateral one. That’s very important, so there can be no mistake. You just got lazy and didn’t verify it all yourself. Seriously, you were just lazy to verify it yourself. Why? Because you know exactly the sequence I follow, what I do, and how I arrive at things. And you clearly know what lines I draw in the cube, which diagonals, and that after that, two tetrahedrons form inside. So what? And what does some hand-drawn sketch have to do with it not matching up for you? You were told: two tetrahedrons inside the cube. It was even shown from which vertices... You see, you can verify this. Make a cube, draw the lines, find the triangle where Jesus, God, the Son of God is placed like that. That’s it — you’ll see it. If you had built a physical model and started rotating it, you’d have seen it. His hands are here, the center is here — it’s all pretty clear. What’s more interesting is that the Spirit said this matrix contains absolutely everything — the structure of all things. And I didn’t use to pay attention to the fact that inside my cube these two triangles — two volumetric tetrahedrons — are intertwined, and that if you look at it in 2D, it forms a six-pointed star. They call it the Star of David, or by other names. A six-pointed star forms in the cube when you draw certain lines, and all the spiritual folks draw it. Great — they know that if you draw lines in a cube you can get that star, but nothing beyond that. And what’s also interesting is that now in the eighth volume I’m already moving on to the next level, continuing to decode this matrix, and in the eighth volume of “Alternative History,” I explain exactly what that six-pointed star means in 2D. In 3D, of course, it’s eight-pointed, because a tetrahedron has four vertices, and when one tetrahedron is inside another — like the masculine and feminine principles — you get that kind of star. You can also call it the stellated octahedron, or the morning star, or the star of Hermes Trismegistus. And it’s there too, which is very, very interesting. So don’t try to understand the matrix if you’re only trying to familiarize yourself with it by reading the book and are too lazy to repeat it physically. You have to build it physically — otherwise, you won’t understand. You need to physically create all these geometric figures, both separately and together, and fit them all into one another and discover all of it. It’s an entire path. Then you won’t be asking questions about whether the triangle is isosceles, equilateral, and so on.