Page 134
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 4:36 pm
Mystic-Old-Man: There is such a point.
Alexandr: And does it tend more toward shrinking or expanding, just so I understand?
Mystic-Old-Man: Toward expanding.
Alexandr: So expansion is the future, contraction is the past. And the recent small planetary alignment, and another one coming at the end of February — is that somehow related to what I’m decoding now, or is it unrelated?
Mystic-Old-Man: There is a connection — it’s all-encompassing.
Alexandr: Alright, another question. So, there’s quantum physics, quantum mechanics, which scientists are trying to decode and apply. In this matrix, the way it unfolds — is that what it is? Is it part of it?
Mystic-Old-Man: Not exactly.
Alexandr: Okay, then let me ask differently. I’m decoding the matrix, and it exists in one size, there’s a smaller version, a larger one, and also one of the same size surrounding it. How many of that same size should surround it?
Mystic-Old-Man: 32.
Alexandr: 32 should surround it at the same scale. And that already forms a new larger one, right?
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes.
Alexandr: Alright, then this matrix I’m talking about, the one that unfolds everywhere — does it begin with a particular geometric shape? With the icosahedron?
Mystic-Old-Man: It has a tendency to begin with anything.
Alexandr: Aha, and it all just loops in on itself like that.
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes, yes, yes.
Alexandr: And is one such cycle enough for me? Or do I need several?
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes, one is enough.
Alexandr: Doesn’t matter which cycle. Interesting that it feels like I’ve almost figured it out, even though it’s taken so long. Okay, let me put it differently, just to clarify. How many percent of it do I still have left to figure out?
Mystic-Old-Man: In this case, quantity doesn’t align with the quality that may be present.
Alexandr: And does it tend more toward shrinking or expanding, just so I understand?
Mystic-Old-Man: Toward expanding.
Alexandr: So expansion is the future, contraction is the past. And the recent small planetary alignment, and another one coming at the end of February — is that somehow related to what I’m decoding now, or is it unrelated?
Mystic-Old-Man: There is a connection — it’s all-encompassing.
Alexandr: Alright, another question. So, there’s quantum physics, quantum mechanics, which scientists are trying to decode and apply. In this matrix, the way it unfolds — is that what it is? Is it part of it?
Mystic-Old-Man: Not exactly.
Alexandr: Okay, then let me ask differently. I’m decoding the matrix, and it exists in one size, there’s a smaller version, a larger one, and also one of the same size surrounding it. How many of that same size should surround it?
Mystic-Old-Man: 32.
Alexandr: 32 should surround it at the same scale. And that already forms a new larger one, right?
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes.
Alexandr: Alright, then this matrix I’m talking about, the one that unfolds everywhere — does it begin with a particular geometric shape? With the icosahedron?
Mystic-Old-Man: It has a tendency to begin with anything.
Alexandr: Aha, and it all just loops in on itself like that.
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes, yes, yes.
Alexandr: And is one such cycle enough for me? Or do I need several?
Mystic-Old-Man: Yes, one is enough.
Alexandr: Doesn’t matter which cycle. Interesting that it feels like I’ve almost figured it out, even though it’s taken so long. Okay, let me put it differently, just to clarify. How many percent of it do I still have left to figure out?
Mystic-Old-Man: In this case, quantity doesn’t align with the quality that may be present.