Page 202
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2026 12:36 pm
Then I began to ask questions through various AI and chats — well, you could
say I call it Google — about whether it’s possible to draw an analogy where
there is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and then there is the
past, future, and present. Here is what they wrote to me: “The Father is
more suited to the past; He is associated with the creation of the world, the
beginning of all things, God’s eternal plan. The Father is the source, that which
was, in the sense of foundation and origin. The Son, Jesus Christ, is the present.
He became incarnate in the human world, came to earth for salvation, and lives
in the present through the Church and the Eucharist. This is the ‘here and now’
aspect — redemption and the presence of God among people. And the Holy Spirit
is the future. The Spirit is the power that leads to completion, inspires holiness,
and promises eternal life and the Second Coming. He symbolizes hope,
transformation, and that which is to come.” But they also write that: “This
analogy emphasizes that, like time, the persons of the Trinity are interconnected:
the past influences the present, and the present leads to the future. However,
critics note that this version is not perfect, since time is linear while God is
outside of time.” On one hand, it is logical: He is outside of time, but for us,
He exists precisely in these three times. And that’s why we are further
warned: “do not divide Him, it is all Him,” because He is everything at once,
but for us, He is this, and that, and the other at different times. That is my
version. What’s interesting is that I then asked the question: “Is it possible
to draw an analogy that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not future, past,
and present, but suppose they are the heart, the mind, and the Spirit?”
and here is what they wrote to me, that the Father as the heart fits. And
how is this analogy drawn accordingly? That is, there are descriptions
of who the Father is, who the Son is, and what the Holy Spirit is. And I
made my own assumption. Does it fit that, let’s say, the Father is the heart,
the Son is precisely the mind — that is, the material — and the Spirit is
spirituality itself, that is, the Spirit. And here is what they wrote to me:
“The Father as the heart. The heart can be associated with love, mercy,
the source of life, which corresponds to the role of the Father as Creator and
the source of all being. In the Bible, the Father is described as loving and caring —
for example, the parable of the Prodigal Son, Luke 15:11–32 — which resonates
with the emotional life function of the heart. This symbolizes His nature as the
beginning and the emotional basis of the divine plan. The Son as the mind.
say I call it Google — about whether it’s possible to draw an analogy where
there is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and then there is the
past, future, and present. Here is what they wrote to me: “The Father is
more suited to the past; He is associated with the creation of the world, the
beginning of all things, God’s eternal plan. The Father is the source, that which
was, in the sense of foundation and origin. The Son, Jesus Christ, is the present.
He became incarnate in the human world, came to earth for salvation, and lives
in the present through the Church and the Eucharist. This is the ‘here and now’
aspect — redemption and the presence of God among people. And the Holy Spirit
is the future. The Spirit is the power that leads to completion, inspires holiness,
and promises eternal life and the Second Coming. He symbolizes hope,
transformation, and that which is to come.” But they also write that: “This
analogy emphasizes that, like time, the persons of the Trinity are interconnected:
the past influences the present, and the present leads to the future. However,
critics note that this version is not perfect, since time is linear while God is
outside of time.” On one hand, it is logical: He is outside of time, but for us,
He exists precisely in these three times. And that’s why we are further
warned: “do not divide Him, it is all Him,” because He is everything at once,
but for us, He is this, and that, and the other at different times. That is my
version. What’s interesting is that I then asked the question: “Is it possible
to draw an analogy that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not future, past,
and present, but suppose they are the heart, the mind, and the Spirit?”
and here is what they wrote to me, that the Father as the heart fits. And
how is this analogy drawn accordingly? That is, there are descriptions
of who the Father is, who the Son is, and what the Holy Spirit is. And I
made my own assumption. Does it fit that, let’s say, the Father is the heart,
the Son is precisely the mind — that is, the material — and the Spirit is
spirituality itself, that is, the Spirit. And here is what they wrote to me:
“The Father as the heart. The heart can be associated with love, mercy,
the source of life, which corresponds to the role of the Father as Creator and
the source of all being. In the Bible, the Father is described as loving and caring —
for example, the parable of the Prodigal Son, Luke 15:11–32 — which resonates
with the emotional life function of the heart. This symbolizes His nature as the
beginning and the emotional basis of the divine plan. The Son as the mind.