Page 297
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2026 1:10 pm
Alexandr: Fine, then let’s take me, Alex, who doesn’t have 50 million
followers, but maybe I am under supervision, and what I do reflects globally
on a large number of people. In the end, does more reflect from me or from
the one with 50 million followers?
Mystic-Old-Man: Is it absolutely necessary to answer this right now?
Alexandr: It’s not for my own vanity. It’s more to confirm the theory so that an
ordinary, simple mortal might think about the fact that the way they behave
is worth considering, because it can reflect on a large number of people
even if they are “nobody.” People think it doesn’t matter.
Mystic-Old-Man: Alex, do you realize that we can pull anything toward
anything through whatever we want, and then claim it is exactly so?
These things... well, let’s just say... You want me to give a definitive answer,
but there is no definitive answer to this.
Alexandr: Fine, fine. If we step away from specific personas. Can you see
whether the person from whom influence over the entire society emanates
is someone significant — a billionaire or a celebrity — or is it just an ordinary
character according to the world’s social statistics?
Mystic-Old-Man: A billionaire cannot influence the whole of society,
no matter how hard they try. Even a trillionaire cannot influence the whole
of society. That is just what we think.
Alexandr: I am also convinced of that — that no matter who they are, even
a trillionaire, they cannot influence society. That is my opinion. Consequently,
it doesn’t matter if you are “significant” or not, right? In social terms.
Mystic-Old-Man: No, no, no, I probably wouldn’t put it that way. It’s both.
One can possess certain knowledge in the segment where their dividends
are invested. The point is, in both cases, you are talking about dividends
invested in something. Any person who finds life interesting has dividends
of that interest. What the dividend of that interest might be doesn’t matter.
Fishing — that is his dividend. He gets a thrill from catching fish; he
doesn’t care about anything else. Someone else does sports — those are his
dividends. Someone else, space, someone else something else, and so on.
There is a unique fragmentation happening here. Perhaps it’s good that
you started this conversation. You know, I just sat down on a bench,
thinking, “something is going to happen today at Patriarch’s Ponds,
followers, but maybe I am under supervision, and what I do reflects globally
on a large number of people. In the end, does more reflect from me or from
the one with 50 million followers?
Mystic-Old-Man: Is it absolutely necessary to answer this right now?
Alexandr: It’s not for my own vanity. It’s more to confirm the theory so that an
ordinary, simple mortal might think about the fact that the way they behave
is worth considering, because it can reflect on a large number of people
even if they are “nobody.” People think it doesn’t matter.
Mystic-Old-Man: Alex, do you realize that we can pull anything toward
anything through whatever we want, and then claim it is exactly so?
These things... well, let’s just say... You want me to give a definitive answer,
but there is no definitive answer to this.
Alexandr: Fine, fine. If we step away from specific personas. Can you see
whether the person from whom influence over the entire society emanates
is someone significant — a billionaire or a celebrity — or is it just an ordinary
character according to the world’s social statistics?
Mystic-Old-Man: A billionaire cannot influence the whole of society,
no matter how hard they try. Even a trillionaire cannot influence the whole
of society. That is just what we think.
Alexandr: I am also convinced of that — that no matter who they are, even
a trillionaire, they cannot influence society. That is my opinion. Consequently,
it doesn’t matter if you are “significant” or not, right? In social terms.
Mystic-Old-Man: No, no, no, I probably wouldn’t put it that way. It’s both.
One can possess certain knowledge in the segment where their dividends
are invested. The point is, in both cases, you are talking about dividends
invested in something. Any person who finds life interesting has dividends
of that interest. What the dividend of that interest might be doesn’t matter.
Fishing — that is his dividend. He gets a thrill from catching fish; he
doesn’t care about anything else. Someone else does sports — those are his
dividends. Someone else, space, someone else something else, and so on.
There is a unique fragmentation happening here. Perhaps it’s good that
you started this conversation. You know, I just sat down on a bench,
thinking, “something is going to happen today at Patriarch’s Ponds,