Page 229
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2026 2:04 pm
So that’s two dodecahedra on the first cube, two dodecahedra on the second, two dodecahedra on the third, two dodecahedra on the fourth. And out of these dodecahedra, if they are made with crosses — that is, with pentacles, with five-pointed stars — a whole bunch more cubes of different dimensions are formed. But both this and that are correct. In the eighth volume I was still thinking — maybe my cube should be just one, as in the second volume, and since there are two dodecahedra on it with all kinds of crosses, that is, with these five-pointed stars, then they form the additional cubes. And there’s no need to copy them in different directions, to turn them, so that there are four cubes within one another. Or, on the contrary, I supposed that maybe one does still need four cubes in different directions, but then there’s no need to multiply a bunch more cubes through the dodecahedra, because then one could get confused. But both this and that are correct.
And my supposition: why was the rhombicuboctahedron being highlighted to me, the one I had to find? In order to once again confirm that my matrix is complete — if I want all the Universe to be within it, all the geometric figures, everything that exists in the world, the matrix as it was, as one detail in the second volume, is not enough. It still must be spun out in different ways, by different degrees. And this has now been confirmed to me by being shown that the rhombicuboctahedron, in order to be inside my matrix, this geometric figure can only exist thanks to the fact that my cube — that is, my matrix… Or rather, let’s put it like this — consists of four matrices, deployed in different directions. And further on I decided to check: do we still need the dodecahedra, then, which form a bunch more cubes? And it was confirmed that we do. I will show this a little later.
And I supposed — this is also strange — that the rhombicuboctahedron… After all, every geometric figure — I shared with the reader before my supposition that every geometric figure is responsible for some kind of Spirit, for some kind of element. And we remember: the octahedron, that little rhombus shape, is air; the cube is earth; the icosahedron, the little sphere made out of small triangles, is water. That is why, in the Bible, in the Apocalypse, it is mentioned that there will be no more sea. And that is referring to this Spirit of justice — that is, the underground kingdom is the little sphere made of triangles.
And my supposition: why was the rhombicuboctahedron being highlighted to me, the one I had to find? In order to once again confirm that my matrix is complete — if I want all the Universe to be within it, all the geometric figures, everything that exists in the world, the matrix as it was, as one detail in the second volume, is not enough. It still must be spun out in different ways, by different degrees. And this has now been confirmed to me by being shown that the rhombicuboctahedron, in order to be inside my matrix, this geometric figure can only exist thanks to the fact that my cube — that is, my matrix… Or rather, let’s put it like this — consists of four matrices, deployed in different directions. And further on I decided to check: do we still need the dodecahedra, then, which form a bunch more cubes? And it was confirmed that we do. I will show this a little later.
And I supposed — this is also strange — that the rhombicuboctahedron… After all, every geometric figure — I shared with the reader before my supposition that every geometric figure is responsible for some kind of Spirit, for some kind of element. And we remember: the octahedron, that little rhombus shape, is air; the cube is earth; the icosahedron, the little sphere made out of small triangles, is water. That is why, in the Bible, in the Apocalypse, it is mentioned that there will be no more sea. And that is referring to this Spirit of justice — that is, the underground kingdom is the little sphere made of triangles.