Page 630
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2026 10:21 am
Then I had thoughts like this: if you’re deciphering the matrix, then which
geometric figures go where? Well, let’s suppose… All right, we go again from the
bottom up along this whole hierarchy. Let’s suppose that each of our animals is
a tetrahedron, that is, a three-dimensional triangle. Then it turns out that if we
have four animals, that means it’s four tetrahedra. This is purely theoretical, don’t
nitpick too hard for now. Let’s simply suppose that we’ll call all of this triangles
altogether. The question is the quantity. Let’s suppose that all of this is triangles
altogether. And one can suppose that heaven, earth, the underground kingdom,
the world of the dead are triangles: a triangle for each, one apiece for now — let’s
suppose it’s one apiece for now. Then further. The moon. What does it consist
of? Of those two worlds: the underground kingdom, the world of the dead. That
is, it turns out the moon is a Merkaba, that is, a star made of two tetrahedra.
That’s two more tetrahedra that only the moon has. And the sun also has two
tetrahedra. So each of our worlds — heaven, earth, the underground kingdom,
the world of the dead — looks like a triangle. Our moon looks like a Merkaba,
the sun also looks like a Merkaba, that is, this is when the stars are made of two
tetrahedra. And the star, then, higher up — what is that? It comes out that it’s
made of four triangles, that is, of two Merkabas. Well, one can suppose so, since
the star is formed precisely thanks to the sun and the moon. But right now I’m
reckoning it this primitively, considering that everything must be separate —
although maybe it’s all one and the same and simply turns somehow. I’m just
showing the path of thinking. There’s such a way of thinking. Now let’s take
another way of thinking. Here are heaven, earth, the underground kingdom, the
world of the dead. Let’s suppose that heaven, earth are a triangle, say, pointing
up, whereas the underground kingdom, the world of the dead are a triangle
pointing down. Let’s suppose, just suppose. And so we’ve crossed them, and
something already came out: either a star, or the sun — it simply depends on how
you turn it. Then you can reckon it that way. But that’s if you don’t take it all by
quantity — which is also somehow illogical. Now further. If there are four animals
and they’re all winged, then maybe each animal — that is, these four lowest
worlds — maybe they’re after all not a triangle apiece, but two triangles each.
Then it turns out we have morning, day, evening, night — that is, heaven, earth,
the underground kingdom, the world of the dead, that is, these four worlds —
then maybe they all have two triangles. That is, ones like these Merkaba-stars;
geometric figures go where? Well, let’s suppose… All right, we go again from the
bottom up along this whole hierarchy. Let’s suppose that each of our animals is
a tetrahedron, that is, a three-dimensional triangle. Then it turns out that if we
have four animals, that means it’s four tetrahedra. This is purely theoretical, don’t
nitpick too hard for now. Let’s simply suppose that we’ll call all of this triangles
altogether. The question is the quantity. Let’s suppose that all of this is triangles
altogether. And one can suppose that heaven, earth, the underground kingdom,
the world of the dead are triangles: a triangle for each, one apiece for now — let’s
suppose it’s one apiece for now. Then further. The moon. What does it consist
of? Of those two worlds: the underground kingdom, the world of the dead. That
is, it turns out the moon is a Merkaba, that is, a star made of two tetrahedra.
That’s two more tetrahedra that only the moon has. And the sun also has two
tetrahedra. So each of our worlds — heaven, earth, the underground kingdom,
the world of the dead — looks like a triangle. Our moon looks like a Merkaba,
the sun also looks like a Merkaba, that is, this is when the stars are made of two
tetrahedra. And the star, then, higher up — what is that? It comes out that it’s
made of four triangles, that is, of two Merkabas. Well, one can suppose so, since
the star is formed precisely thanks to the sun and the moon. But right now I’m
reckoning it this primitively, considering that everything must be separate —
although maybe it’s all one and the same and simply turns somehow. I’m just
showing the path of thinking. There’s such a way of thinking. Now let’s take
another way of thinking. Here are heaven, earth, the underground kingdom, the
world of the dead. Let’s suppose that heaven, earth are a triangle, say, pointing
up, whereas the underground kingdom, the world of the dead are a triangle
pointing down. Let’s suppose, just suppose. And so we’ve crossed them, and
something already came out: either a star, or the sun — it simply depends on how
you turn it. Then you can reckon it that way. But that’s if you don’t take it all by
quantity — which is also somehow illogical. Now further. If there are four animals
and they’re all winged, then maybe each animal — that is, these four lowest
worlds — maybe they’re after all not a triangle apiece, but two triangles each.
Then it turns out we have morning, day, evening, night — that is, heaven, earth,
the underground kingdom, the world of the dead, that is, these four worlds —
then maybe they all have two triangles. That is, ones like these Merkaba-stars;