Page 707

[Alexandr Korol]

to become the Son of God — that’s a separate version, as if from a different angle of conversation, and that could also be true. And now I’ve added more, referencing the show, added even more information. Well, I keep decoding, decoding.

Question: There is a popular paradox about time travel: if you meet yourself from the future, then in the future you must visit your younger self. And this puts the whole theory of time travel at risk. After all, in the future, you could simply choose not to visit yourself and break the loop. Despite this, in the second chapter we begin to understand that this contact doesn’t necessarily have to be physical. Is it possible that on the next level, when a person becomes God, he must guide his “son” to activate something within himself, also as one of the stages of development? In general, what are the motives of the higher power to watch over itself if it’s already there?

It’s very difficult — really — to reason about this. There are so many possibilities, and it’s so far beyond, that back then, when I was inspired and in the Spirit in the second volume of “Alternative History,” whatever first came to me in the form of images, pictures, and sensations — that’s what I described. And, let’s say, at that time I had the courage, because when you’re in the Spirit, there’s no such thing as right or wrong, doubt or no doubt. And so, what I recorded then must contain a portion of true truth. If you start discussing this, trying to reason about this topic with the human mind, using those old human ways of thinking — oh, we’ll just get lost in the weeds, seriously. The Spirit spoke then freely, without hesitation, you could say — offered the options. So that means they’re as close to the truth as possible. Maybe, of course, some of the words weren’t quite right, but the essence remained the essence — it is true. What else can I add to your question? I have one theory. I’ve wrestled with this topic, of course — the very thing you want to understand, the thing you’re asking about. I have a theory that, let’s suppose, time — time definitely has a beginning and an end. And the world in which people live, this world has time. And I’ve suggested that if in our world — the one we live in now — let’s say this is the era of social networks, just to name it like that. Even though what we have now is simply the beginning of the age of social networks, while the era itself is much longer.