Page 491

[Alexandr Korol]

live in a world where every person has a zodiac sign, and those signs are divided into four seasons, four elements, then we can already presume that people fall into four groups. And within each group, there are three subgroups. So imagine: there are twelve basic types of people, maybe even twenty-four. That’s already twenty-four different perspectives just on what love is. And now imagine seeing through the eyes of each of those people — each of the twelve or twenty-four human archetypes — how they would interpret my book “Alternative History.” That’s what I mean. So why aren’t my books flat, if we go back to the question about depth? Because I touch on deep themes. And I can return to the topic of love from volume to volume because I can list out the perspectives and opinions of people from the first group of humanity, the second, the third — and just imagine how many there are. At least twelve, maybe twenty-four, maybe even more. That’s why I can keep writing and writing and writing.

Question: You wrote that in the spiritual world, just like in the material one, there are many different frequencies. The material is more or less easy to imagine because it is usually visual. Please give examples and distinctions of the different frequencies of spiritual worlds.

Spiritual worlds... I’m trying right now to control myself so that this information stays within the mindset I had when I was working on the first volume, because now, after the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth volumes, of course, I would answer differently. But I need to respond within the framework of that author, that version of myself, the way I thought when I completed the first volume. Well, okay. In the social-material sense, why is it clear that there are different material worlds? Because you can visually imagine a material person. Figuratively speaking, a politician, a businessman, or some kind of artist. No, not an artist — wait, not an artist, but an athlete. And you think, these are different worlds, because you see a person in a formal suit or a person in a tracksuit. That’s how you categorize them. Then you might see them by status — this one is rich, that one is poor. So you think that all these are social-material groups, and therefore these are material worlds. But that’s not true. That’s not how you should think. Why? Because if you think that way, it’s as if you’re assuming that just because a person wears certain clothes and does certain things, that already places them