Page 350

[Alexandr Korol]

where the triangle is — he didn’t understand that, and instead tried to reason it out with his mind. But I have a real mark on my hand, a perfect triangle. He couldn’t say anything about the Philosopher’s Stone either — when I will solve it or how it’s built. Then he mentioned 82% — that’s about how close I am to the state of nirvana. And he said “my organization,” when I asked why I was in that state of nirvana as a child — whether I did that myself or not. And what did he mean by that? Well, because there’s the me from over there, and the me from here — and that “me” from there, and this one, and all of it together — that’s what switched it on. That’s why he couldn’t say it directly.

Because the most fascinating thing — you know what all of you need to realize? I’m decoding the matrix every day. But do you understand that in the future, I’ve already solved it? I mean, that’s already clear — to me, and to you. It’s already solved in the future. But still, you see, I walk the path. That means I don’t even need to worry, I don’t need to doubt — because it’s already solved by me in the future. That’s where all this information comes from, and that’s why I am the way I am. And yet, I still must go through it sincerely, from scratch, as if I’m decoding this matrix all over again. I’m already reusing all my bamboo sticks that I use to build the matrix. But I have a lot of discoveries — I’ve actually made some very good progress.

Now I’ve tried a method: I created each geometric shape — there are only 5 regular polyhedra — and I decided to build each one using only tetrahedrons. So for example, if I take a bunch of tetrahedrons and try to connect them in the right way, I can form a cube. If I take tetrahedrons and join them, I might form a larger tetrahedron. If I arrange them correctly, I can form an octahedron inside or between them — a rhombus-like structure. And now I’ve arrived at the icosahedron. So the question is: how can that one be constructed? It consists of flat outer triangles — if I’m not mistaken, there are 20 of them. So it turns out I just need to connect 20 tetrahedrons in such a way that the icosahedron forms underneath them. But what’s even more fascinating is this: when I built this icosahedron, I noticed that those five-pointed stars I was making inside it — turns out, they’re not really pentagrams, not actual pentacles inside the icosahedron. What’s really inside the icosahedron